2010_307_EU on the monitoring of acrylamide levels in food
ID: |
9CB7C28657D6403C002C9D80C5000EAC |
文件大小(MB): |
0.47 |
页数: |
7 |
文件格式: |
|
日期: |
2013-4-11 |
购买: |
文本摘录(文本识别可能有误,但文件阅览显示及打印正常,pdf文件可进行文字搜索定位):
RECOMMENDATIONS,COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION,of 2 June 2010,on the monitoring of acrylamide levels in food,(Text with EEA relevance),(2010/307/EU),THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 292 thereof,Whereas:,(1) Commission Recommendation 2007/331/EC of 3 May 2007 on the monitoring of acrylamide levels in food ( 1 ) sets out a three year monitoring programme (2007-2009) for acrylamide in certain foodstuffs.,(2) The results for 2007 have been compiled by the European Food Safety Authority (hereinafter the ‘EFSA’) in the Scientific Report on ‘Results on the monitoring of acrylamide levels in food’ ( 2 ), issued on 30 April 2009. The report also includes acrylamide results for 2003-2006 collected from the Member States and compiled by the Commission’s Joint Research Centre’s Institute for Reference Materials and Measurements. The results for the years 2008 and 2009 are not yet available. Once they will be available, the Scientific Report will be updated.,(3) The Confederation of the Food and Drink Industry (CIAA) developed a ‘toolbox’ containing tools that can be used selectively by food producers in line with their particular needs to lower acrylamide levels in their products.,(4) The EFSA report of 30 April 2009 concluded that there was no consistent trend across food groups towards lower levels of acrylamide and that it was not clear at that stage if the acrylamide toolbox had achieved its desired effects.,(5) Efforts by food industry and Member States to investigate pathways of formation and ways to reduce acrylamide levels in foodstuffs are ongoing. In order to be able to monitor the impact of those efforts, it is appropriate to continue the collection of data.,(6) Experience in the application of Recommendation 2007/331/EC has shown that the monitoring programme needs some adaptations, e.g. as regards the classification of foodstuffs.,(7) It is important that the monitoring results are reported once a year to the EFSA which will ensure the compilation of those data into a database.,(8) This recommendation should not be limited in time, but the need for monitoring should be assessed on a regular basis,HAS ADOPTED THIS RECOMMENDATION:,1. Member States should perform, in accordance with the Annex to this Recommendation, the monitoring of acrylamide levels in the foodstuffs referred to in that Annex.,2. Member States should provide to the EFSA by 1 June of each year and for the first time by 1 June 2011 the data for the previous year in the format as set out by EFSA for compilation into one database.,3. In order to ensure that the samples are representative for the sampled lot, Member States should follow the sampling procedures laid down in part B of the Annex to Commission Regulation (EC) No 333/2007 of 28 March 2007 laying down the methods of sampling and analysis for the official control of the levels of lead, cadmium, mercury, inorganic tin, 3-MCPD and benzo(a)pyrene in foodstuffs ( 3 ).EN L 137/4 Official Journal of the European Union 3.6.2010,( 1 ) OJ L 123, 12.5.2007, p. 33.,( 2 ) EFSA Scientific Report (2009) 285.,( 3 ) OJ L 88, 29.3.2007, p. 29.,4. Member States should carry out the analysis of acrylamide in accordance with the criteria laid down in points 1 and 2 of Annex III to Regulation (EC) No 882/2004 of the European Parliament and the Council of 29 April 2004 on official controls to ensure the verification of compliance with feed and food law, animal health and animal welfare rules ( 1 ).,Done at Brussels, 2 June 2010.,For the Commission,John DALLI,Member of the CommissionEN 3.6.2010 Official Journal of the European Union L 137/5,( 1 ) OJ L 165, 30.4.2004, p. 1.,ANNEX,A. Sampling points and procedure,1. The sampling of the products should be carried out at market level (e.g. at supermarkets, smaller shops, bakeries, French fries outlets and restaurants), where there is a good traceability, or at production sites. Products with origin in one of the Member States should be sampled wherever possible ( 1 ).,2. Sampling and analysis should be carried out before the expiry date of the sample.,B. Products, sample numbers and frequencies, analytical requirements,1. The table below gives an overview on the recommended minimum number of samples to analyse annually for each product category. Member States are invited to take more samples when possible. The distribution of samples per Member State is based on population figures with a minimum sample number of 4 per product category and Member State.,2. The sample numbers refer to the minimum number of samples to be taken annually. Where specific……
……